In a move that has ignited widespread international condemnation, former U.S. President Donald Trump suggested that the United States should "take over" the Gaza Strip and transform it into the "Riviera of the Middle East." His remarks came during a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on February 5, 2025. Trump proposed relocating the Palestinian population to neighboring countries such as Egypt and Jordan to facilitate reconstruction efforts, promising a complete overhaul of Gaza with new housing and employment opportunities (People).
Backlash from the International Community
Trump’s statement was met with immediate backlash from multiple countries and international organizations. Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia strongly opposed the idea of displacing Gaza’s population, with critics warning that such a move could amount to ethnic cleansing. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas denounced the proposal, affirming that Gaza is an integral part of Palestine and rejecting any forced relocation (New York Magazine).
U.S. Government Attempts to Walk Back Remarks
Following the uproar, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio clarified that the administration had no intention of permanently taking control of Gaza. Instead, he framed the idea as a temporary intervention to clear debris and unexploded ordnance. However, the damage was already done, as the United Nations and Amnesty International warned that any forced population transfer could violate international law (The Guardian).
Reactions from Israel
While Netanyahu expressed appreciation for Trump’s support, he emphasized that dismantling Hamas and stabilizing Gaza was Israel’s responsibility. The Israeli government has been focused on military operations in Gaza, and many within the country remain skeptical about the feasibility of Trump’s plan (New York Magazine).
What’s Next?
As controversy continues to swirl around Trump’s remarks, the international community remains divided on the future of Gaza. While some see the proposal as an impractical and legally dubious idea, others believe it reflects growing frustrations over the ongoing crisis in the region. Regardless, the global response suggests that any plan involving forced relocation or foreign occupation of Gaza will face significant resistance.